Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #468

open

mcast: linearity requirement enforced/document incorrectly

Added by Sven Eckelmann about 2 months ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Target version:
-
Start date:
08/22/2026
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:

Description

https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260821094813.201800-1-sw%40simonwunderlich.de?part=8

Discovered by: gpt-5-6-sol, opus-5 ยท Missed by: sashiko-gemini
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but the new comment states a
whole-skb requirement that the existing kernel-doc contradicts.

batadv_mcast_forw_scrape() documents only a prefix requirement:

  • Caller needs to ensure that the region from the skb data's start up
  • to/including the to be removed bytes are linearized.

while its body asserts the entire skb is linear:

>     SKB_LINEAR_ASSERT(skb);
> 

with, in include/linux/skbuff.h:
>     #define SKB_LINEAR_ASSERT(skb)  BUG_ON(skb_is_nonlinear(skb))
> 

Similarly, batadv_mcast_forw_packet()'s kernel-doc lists the caller
obligations (set network/transport header, free the skb) but does not
mention linearity at all; only the in-body comment mentions it, and it
also understates the assert:
>     /* (at least) TVLV part needs to be linearized */
>     SKB_LINEAR_ASSERT(skb);
> 

Should the kernel-doc of batadv_mcast_forw_scrape() and
batadv_mcast_forw_packet() be updated to say the whole skb must be linear?

Along the same lines, the invariant this patch establishes is not recorded
at either interface boundary: batadv_mcast_forw_push()'s kernel-doc does
not mention that on success the skb is linear, and neither the
batadv_mcast_forw_mcsend() kernel-doc nor its declaration in
net/batman-adv/multicast.h mentions the precondition that
batadv_mcast_forw_packet() enforces with BUG_ON().

No in-tree caller violates this today: batadv_recv_mcast_packet() unshares
and linearizes, and the batadv_mcast_forw_mcsend() path is now covered by
the skb_linearize() added here. Would documenting the requirement help
avoid a future caller reintroducing the BUG?

No data to display

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF